Related Sections: Game Diaries

Political Machine 2008: Obama messes with Texas

PM2008_GD_09.jpgI've just noticed that when I reload a game, a lot of the data is different from when I saved the game. The percentages in different states have changed. The issues no longer show whether they've risen or fallen in priority. The projected electoral college vote is different.

Instead of McCain leading by 20 electoral votes, as he did when I saved the game, the current polling shows McCain up by 100 electoral votes. How frustrating. Not only can I not track how well I'm doing overall, but I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do against an opponent who blatantly cheats. So with only two months left in an election that makes Zimbabwe look like fair play, I make a drastic decision. I am going to Texas. Read about it after the jump.

Originally, I figured Texas wasn't worth the bother, since McCain was probably going to get those 34 electoral votes anyway. So Obama hasn't campaigned in the Lone Star State. He hasn't so much as dipped a toe into Texas, which has only a 5% awareness of him. That's about to change.

(By the way, here's another bit of The Political Machine that's either broken or incorrectly documented. The game tells me that every television ad should raise my candidate's awareness by three points nationally. This important benefit is one of the reasons TV is so expensive. But I've got five TV ads running. Assuming it's working like it should, Obama's awareness shouldn't be lower than 15 in any state. Yet plenty of states, most of them rectangular and in the west, have only a 5% awareness of Obama.)

Obama becomes a Texas hurricane. He spends almost all of September campaigning here. He brings along with him a squad of four intimidators, who were purchased by spending a metric butt-ton of political capital. These intimidators will knock down McCain's awareness rating among Texans. Obama, his VP candidate (me!), and a couple of consultants set about raising his awareness rating. Speeches are given and advertising is purchased to rejigger the issues Texans care about. John McCain favors high gas prices! John McCain opposes improving the economy! John McCain opposes the environment! Yes, the actual environment. The entire thing! He's against it. All of it! That's the message spread through Texas over the course of September.

By the end of the month, the previous number one issue – withdrawing from Iraq – has dropped to number four. Texas is still breaking for McCain at 52% to 42%, but that's a darn sight better than the beginning of the month, when McCain had 69% and Obama had 26%. And I've got a month left. Come election night, I may very well be able to swing 34 Texan electoral college votes from McCain over to Obama.

And what did McCain do all September while Obama spent the entire month courting the most valuable Republican state? Did he make a play for California or New York? Did he break the deadlock in Ohio or Florida? Did he close the narrow Democratic leads in Pennsylvania or North Carolina? Nope. McCain went to Kentucky and gave a speech accusing Barack Obama of supporting the obesity crisis.

At the point, I'm convinced the "challenging" AI is challenging because you never know what crazy pointless thing it's going to do next.

Send-A-Friend
(3) Comments

mvymvy:
The real issue is not how well Obama or McCain might do in the closely divided battleground states, but that we sho...More »


Comments

By CRotear at 3:24 AM ON 07/13/08

So are you concluding that Political Machine is a crappy game??

That a saved game does not actually save the game really sucks.

By Tom Chick at 6:13 PM ON 07/13/08

In ways Political Machine is a crappy game. But it's still a fascinating portrayal of the political process. It's just a shame that Stardock focused on giving it a 3D engine rather than addressing gameplay and interface problems.

And I'm *really* disappointed at whatever's going on with the AI. Stardock has historically been great at AI, so it's disheartening to see the blatant cheating and the lack of strategy. I'd played several games of Political Machine without watching the AI very closely, and now I kind of wish I'd continued ignoring it. Because knowing what I know now, after documenting every AI move for my notes, I've pretty much lost all interest in ever playing again...

By mvymvy at 1:58 PM ON 07/14/08

The real issue is not how well Obama or McCain might do in the closely divided battleground states, but that we shouldn't have battleground states and spectator states in the first place. Every vote in every state should be politically relevant in a presidential election. And, every vote should be equal. We should have a national popular vote for President in which the White House goes to the candidate who gets the most popular votes in all 50 states.

The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral vote -- that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

Because of state-by-state enacted rules for winner-take-all awarding of their electoral votes, recent candidates with limited funds have concentrated their attention on a handful of closely divided "battleground" states. Two-thirds of the visits and money were focused in just six states; 88% on 9 states, and 99% of the money went to just 16 states. Two-thirds of the states and people have been merely spectators to the presidential election.

Another shortcoming of the current system is that a candidate can win the Presidency without winning the most popular votes nationwide.

The National Popular Vote bill has been approved by 20 legislative chambers (one house in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina, and Washington, and two houses in Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont). It has been enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring this legislation into effect.

See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
susan


Leave a Comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

(Please be patient, it may take a moment for your comment to appear.)

Fidgit continues below
Text FIDGIT to 72434
Follow Fidgit on Twitter
Editor
Tom Chick
Editor
editor@fidgit.com
©2009, SCI FI. All rights reserved.